  & \multicolumn{1}{P{1.2in}}{Control mean: credit claiming call only} & \multicolumn{2}{P{2in}}{ITT: marg effect of IVR q}\\
  & \multicolumn{1}{P{1.2in}}{\{H1\}} & \multicolumn{2}{P{2in}}{\{H2\} vs. \{H1\}}\\
\cmidrule(lr){2-2} \cmidrule(lr){3-4}
Outcome & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\mu$} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\tau$} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{N}\\
\midrule
\textbf{Incumbent evaluations index} & -0.018 & 0.004 & 9164\\
 & (1.007) & (0.012) & \\
 & & & \\
\;\;MPA feeling thermometer (1-10) & 4.778 & 0.014 & 9162\\
 & (3.377) & (0.051) & \\
 & & & \\
\;\;MPA party feeling thermometer (1-10) & 4.480 & 0.031 & 9166\\
 & (3.486) & (0.046) & \\
 & & & \\
\;\;Voted for MPA (0/1) & 0.331 & -0.002 & 9160\\
 & (0.471) & (0.005) & \\
 & & & \\
\;\;Inverse rank of MPA (1-5) & 2.646 & 0.009 & 8866\\
 & (1.473) & (0.023) & \\
 & & & \\
\textbf{Political participation index} & -0.014 & -0.009 & 9179\\
 & (0.987) & (0.021) & \\
 & & & \\
\;\;Voted (0/1) & 0.985 & -0.001 & 8834\\
 & (0.123) & (0.003) & \\
 & & & \\
\;\;Attended rally (0/1) & 0.234 & -0.001 & 9167\\
 & (0.423) & (0.009) & \\
 & & & \\
\;\;Attended political meeting (0/1) & 0.176 & -0.003 & 9179\\
 & (0.381) & (0.008) & \\
 & & & \\
\textbf{Prospects for accountability index} & -0.003 & 0.016 & 9166\\
 & (0.995) & (0.022) & \\
 & & & \\
\;\;Political efficacy (1-5) & 3.789 & -0.003 & 9283\\
 & (1.146) & (0.026) & \\
 & & & \\
\;\;Vote choice based on performance (1-6) & 4.257 & 0.010 & 9129\\
 & (1.681) & (0.033) & \\
 & & & \\
\;\;N political conversations & 3.723 & 0.054 & 9312\\
 & (2.357) & (0.052) & \\
 & & & \\
\textbf{Global index} & -0.022 & 0.006 & 9293\\
 & (1.009) & (0.017) & \\
 & & & \\
